Monthly Archives: May 2014
Senators deplore name “Redskins,” demeaning to Native Americans
Fifty US Senators signed a letter to the commissioner of football urging that the demeaning name "Washington Redskins" be changed. The team should have a name reflecting the dignity of Native Americans. What should it be? No doubt the Senators told the owner to look no further than the reverential spirit of the team's boosters.
Rumors swirl about another offensive team name, the New York Giants. Look for a change to the New York Dimensionally Challenged.
This is the wonderful Andre the Giant (that is, Vertically Independent).
Ah, words!
(Courtesy of Numbers the roach.)
What’s with your antichrist?
(Courtesy of Numbers the roach.)
The fall of the masculine and the doom of the species
During the recent evolution of Homo sapiens, the attributes considered most desirable in a male have changed a great deal. Physical strength, once essential to producing and protecting a viable child, has given way to status, even if it has been gained by the accident of birth and the daring cowardice of one's underlings.
In North Korea, this is the male exemplar.
This is the ally:
This is the result:
If only this was a joke.
(Courtesy of Numbers the roach.)
Islam saving humans from extinction
A week ago, Boko Haram, a group of gentlemen striving to turn Nigeria into a sharia state, kidnapped 276 girls from their school. Boko Haram insists that educating women violates the will of Allah. These girls will now be sold as sex slaves or child brides, which is more what the deity had in mind for them.
It is impossible to argue with the fundamental Darwinian logic of Boko Haram. As shown here
educated women bear many few women than do those who remain illiterate. Other religions claim to be guardians of humanity, but men stand by while women render themselves infertile by reading. Islam alone understands that the future of the species can be guaranteed only by female illiteracy and ignorance.
(Courtesy of Numbers the roach.)
Want people to read? Need road-side assistance? Flash your headlights.
How deeply do humans thirst to share their thoughts about literature? The Outdoor Co-Ed Topless Pulp Fiction Appreciation Society–a real entity, recently celebrated in the media; I could not invent something so degenerate–offers an answer. Young women congregate to bare their souls about books, while baring their breasts. Anyone who suggests that they are drawn together by anything but naked intelligence is sexist.
I don't understand why humans like to show those things off—the way they protrude and hang, as if by a cruel misstep of evolution. But people love to look at them. My question is: if you want to display your tits, can't you just do it? Why do you have to drag books into it? What have they ever done to be so humiliated?
Herein are the scholars. I know you are looking at them so you can guess what books they are reading and what the conference about them was like. Otherwise you'd just be some kind of pervert.